®Planning appeal decision
Flats 1-6, 45A Prout Grove, London, NW10 1PU
Planning appeal 3248089 at Flats 1-6, 45A Prout Grove, London, NW10 1PU (London Borough of Brent) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 6 August 2021 by Inspector Satheesan R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: This ground [b], and effectively Appeal B as well, turns on the question of whether any of the units of accommodation were being used as flat(s).
Without planning permission, the material change of use of the premises to a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) and flats("the unauthorised change of use)
- Authority
- London Borough of Brent
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Satheesan R
- Postcode
- NW10 1PU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- This ground [b], and effectively Appeal B as well, turns on the question of whether any of the units of accommodation were being used as flat(s)
- The main issue on appeal B is whether the Council's refusal to issue a certificate is well founded. In this case, the main issue is 'Whether the appellant has proven on the balance of probability that the use of the property changed to 6 self-contained flats (Use Class C3) on or before 4 August 2015 (that being 4 years prior to the date of the LDC application) and that the use then continued without significant interruption for 4 years after the date of the change'
What decided it
The Inspector's factual finding, based on site observations, photographic evidence and witness testimony, that all six rooms lacked the facilities required for day-to-day private domestic existence and relied on a communal kitchen, meaning the premises functioned solely as an HMO rather than a mixed HMO/flats use.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- Westminster CC v SoSCLG [2015] EWCA Civ 482; Islington Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2019] EWHC 2691 (Admin); R (on the application of Welwyn Hatfield Council) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2009] EWHC 966 (Admin); Swale Borough Council v First Secretary of State [2005] EWCA Civ 1568; Uratemp Holdings Ltd v Collins [2001] UKHL 43; Brent LBC v Secretary of State and Reiner [2020] EWHC 3620 (Admin); Gravesham BC v Secretary of State for Environment (1984) 47 P & CR 142; Hammersmith LBC v SoSE [1975] 30 P&CR 19
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Brent
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice upheld30 September 2026335948630 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
- Planning permission granted25 September 2026337716026 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
- Notice upheld24 September 20263365164Land and Garage, Rear of 21 Ivy Road and Adjacent to 31 Cedar Road, London, NW2 6SN
- Split Decision17 September 2026335746261 Alder Grove, London, NW2 7DE
- Notice varied and upheld16 September 2026336503173A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.