Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld12 August 20213253032

Land at 33 Hamilton Road, Harrow, HA1 1SX, And 49 High Mead, Harrow, HA1 2TX

Planning appeal 3253032 at Land at 33 Hamilton Road, Harrow, HA1 1SX, And 49 High Mead, Harrow, HA1 2TX (London Borough of Harrow) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 12 August 2021 by Inspector Rogers B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control.

without planning permission: 1. The erection of an outbuilding in the rear garden of the Land shown hatched red on the annexed plan (Unauthorised Building) and; 2. The material change of use of the Land from use as a single dwelling house to use as two dwelling houses

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rogers B
Postcode
HA1 2TX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control
  • Whether the operational development (extension and alteration of the outbuilding) was lawful
  • Whether the breach of planning control occurred more than four years before the notice was issued
  • Whether the requirements of the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach

What decided it

The 2008 building became immune from enforcement action four years after substantial completion, and the 2017 works marked a new chapter in the planning history rather than a continuation, so the notice should be corrected and varied to address only the 2017 unauthorised development.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Kestrel Hydro v SSCLG [2016] EWCA Civ 784; Mansi v Elstree RDC [1964] 16 P&CR 153

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

473 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263355600
    Masons Arms, 75 High Street, Edgware, HA8 7DD
  2. Dismissed26 May 20263362512
    Stop N Shop, 5 Stuart Road, Harrow, HA3 7RF
  3. Notice upheld26 May 20263362509
    Land at 5 Stuart Road, Harrow, HA3 7RF
  4. Quashed On Legal Grounds26 May 20263349151
    81 Imperial Drive, Harrow, HA2 7DU
  5. Split Decision29 April 20263325757
    16 Brookshill Avenue, Harrow, HA3 6RZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.