Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds28 February 20223254557

49 Scrutton Street, Hackney, LONDON, EC2A 4PJ

the material change of use of the property to use as a dwelling and associated extensions and alterations

Authority
London Borough of Hackney
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Fleming D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether, on the balance of probabilities, the residential use of the property began more than four years before the notice was issued and continued (without a material break) such that at the relevant date enforcement action could no longer be taken (ground (d))

What decided it

The Inspector found, on the balance of probabilities, that the residential use of the whole property had continued without material interruption for more than four years before the notice was issued, so the use had become immune from enforcement action.

Judgments cited: Gravesham BC v SSE and O'Brien [1983] JPL 306; Swale BC v FSS & Lee [2005] EWCA Civ 1568 [2006] JPL 886; Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.