Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds10 August 20213257301

68 East Dulwich Grove, LONDON, SE22 8PS

Without planning permission, the material change of use of the Property by subdividing the Property to create 12 self contained dwelling flats (six studio flats on the ground floor, four studio flats on the first floor and two studio flats on the second floor) (“the Unauthorised Use”)

Authority
London Borough of Southwark
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Satheesan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether there has been a material change of use of the property by subdividing the property to create 12 self-contained dwellings

What decided it

The units lacked the physical facilities (kitchens, bathrooms, living areas) necessary to function as self-contained dwellings and had never been occupied as such, so no material change of use had in fact occurred.

Judgments cited: Cynon Valley Borough Council v Secretary of State for Wales (1987) 53 P. & C.R. 68.1; Impey v SSE and Lake District SPB [1984] 47 P & CR 157; Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG and Beesley [2011] UKSC 15; Gravesham BC v SSE [1984] 47 P&CR 143

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.