Planning appeal decision
Land West of Rock Lane, Melling, Bootle, Merseyside, L31 1EW
Planning appeal 3258166 at Land West of Rock Lane, Melling, Bootle, Merseyside, L31 1EW (Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 2 December 2021 by Inspector Renaudon L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the openness and the purposes of the Green Belt ('definitional harm' by reason of inappropriateness being agreed).
unauthorised change of use of the site for residential purposes including the siting of caravans
- Authority
- Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Renaudon L
- Postcode
- L31 1EW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the openness and the purposes of the Green Belt ('definitional harm' by reason of inappropriateness being agreed)
- Any other harm and/or policy conflicts arising, particularly the effects of the development on highway safety, on the character and appearance of the site and the area, and in relation to contamination, flooding and drainage
- Whether any harm to the Green Belt and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances justifying the development, including the need for and supply of traveller sites, the availability of alternative sites, and the personal circumstances of the appellant and her family, including the best interests of the children and any human rights arising
- The reasonableness of the requirements to remove all the imported hardcore and the time given for compliance with the notices, should the appeals on grounds (f) and (g) fall to be considered
What decided it
The cumulative weight of the family's lack of alternative site availability together with the health, welfare and educational needs of the children was found clearly to outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm, amounting to very special circumstances.
The substantial Green Belt harm (and limited weight attributed to the intentional unauthorised development) was clearly outweighed by the cumulative weight of other considerations - the lack of alternative sites, the likelihood that need would otherwise have to be met elsewhere in the Green Belt, and the personal, health and educational circumstances of the family and children - such that very special circumstances existed and the balance tipped in favour of granting permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- HC5EQ2EQ3MN7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 150Paragraph 143Paragraph 144
- Judgments
- Europa Oil and Gas v SSHCLG [2013] EWHC 2643 (Admin); [2014] EWCA Civ 825; Lee Valley RPA v Epping Forest DC [2016] EWCA Civ 404; Turner v SSCLG [2016] EWCA Civ 466; Sefton MBC v SSHCLG [2021] EWHC 1082 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Sefton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed23 September 20266008723Land to the Rear of Abbey Gardens, Southport Road, Lydiate, L31 4EQ
- Notice varied and upheld26 May 20263374215Land at Southport And Birkdale Sports Club, Trafalgar Road, Birkdale, PR8 2HF
- Notice varied and upheld26 May 2026337166620 Sandringham Road, Formby, L37 6EQ
- Allowed20 April 20266002681Land off Liverpool Road North, Maghull, L31 0AE
- Notice varied and upheld27 February 2026335805568 Warren Road, Blundellsands, Crosby, L23 6UG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®