Planning appeal decision
53 Ridge Hill, London, NW11 8PR
Without planning permission, the use of the building in the rear garden as two self-contained dwellinghouses
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Perkins L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether copies of the enforcement notice were served as required by section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control
- Whether the period for compliance with the requirements of the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed
What decided it
The enforcement notice was properly served, its requirements were necessary to remedy the breach by removing facilities integral to the unlawful use, and the 6-month compliance period was reasonable given the tenancy terms allowing 3 months' notice.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®