Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld22 December 20223262530

53 Ridge Hill, London, NW11 8PR

Without planning permission, the use of the building in the rear garden as two self-contained dwellinghouses

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Perkins L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether copies of the enforcement notice were served as required by section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
  • Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control
  • Whether the period for compliance with the requirements of the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed

What decided it

The enforcement notice was properly served, its requirements were necessary to remedy the breach by removing facilities integral to the unlawful use, and the 6-month compliance period was reasonable given the tenancy terms allowing 3 months' notice.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.