Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision4 October 20213263107

Land at Field Near Lime Kiln Court, Tytherington, South Gloucestershire, BS35 3AB

Planning appeal 3263107 at Land at Field Near Lime Kiln Court, Tytherington, South Gloucestershire, BS35 3AB (South Gloucestershire Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 4 October 2021 by Inspector Merrett R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and development plan policy.

Without planning permission, the change of use of the land from agricultural use to use as a mixed use Gypsy/Traveller Residential Site and Equestrian Site, with the stationing of 2no. touring caravans; The erection of boundary fencing and gates, the construction of wooden buildings and the laying of hardstanding to facilitate the Gypsy/Traveller Residential Use; Erection of fences and a wooden stable building, and the laying of hardstanding to facilitate the Equestrian Use

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Merrett R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and development plan policy
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on highway and pedestrian safety
  • Whether the site can be regarded as being in a sustainable location
  • The storage and accessibility of household waste
  • Whether intentional unauthorised development has occurred
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The appellant's personal circumstances, particularly the best interests of his grandson, combined with the lack of a 5-year supply of deliverable Traveller sites, clearly outweighed the Green Belt harm and amounted to very special circumstances justifying a personal permanent permission for the residential use.

The limited Green Belt harm from inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with very limited weight against intentional unauthorised development, was clearly outweighed by moderate weight afforded to the lack of alternative/deliverable sites and significant weight given to the appellant's personal circumstances and the best interests of the child, tipping the balance in favour of a personal permanent permission for the residential use; no such balancing exercise applied to the stable building, which was refused.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS5Policy CS8Policy CS9Policy CS21Policy CS34Policy PSP1Policy PSP2Policy PSP7Policy PSP10Policy PSP11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147
Judgments
Turner v SSCLG & East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266011871
    49 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
  2. Dismissed13 October 20266010963
    Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266009931
    Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY
  4. Planning permission granted4 September 20263378284
    Land Adjacent to Orchard Farm Cottage, Pomphrey Hill, Mangotsfield, Bristol, BS16 9NF
  5. Planning permission granted17 August 20263378286
    Land At Northwick Road, Pilning, Bristol, BS35 4LX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.