Planning appeal decision
The Sculpture Park, Jumps Road, Churt, Farnham, GU10 2LB
i) The material change of use of the Land from woodland (agricultural use) to use as a sculpture park, arboretum and water gardens (sui generis use) and associated storage. ii) An engineering operation consisting of the construction of hardstanding to facilitate the use of part of the Land for purposes associated with the use of the adjacent land as a sculpture park, arboretum and water gardens. The area of hardstanding is shown crosshatched on the attached plan
- Authority
- Waverley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- leisure-sport · Major retail and services
- Inspector
- Graham J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- its effect on the character and appearance of the area, on its biodiversity, and on highway safety
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness – and any other harm – would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with considerable harm to the character and appearance of the AONB, was not outweighed by the limited benefits claimed, so very special circumstances did not exist.
the substantial weight of harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the considerable weight of harm to the character and appearance of the area clearly outweighed the limited weight attached to the claimed tourism and economic benefits
Framework references: 147, 148, 150, 177
Plan policies cited: Policy RE3
Judgments cited: University of Leicester v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others [2016] EWHC 476 (Admin); R v Ashford BC ex parte Shepway DC [1999] P.L.C.R.12; [1998] JPL 1073; Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74; London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Others [2019] UKSC 33; Breckland DC v Secretary of State [2020] EWHC 292 (Admin); Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®