Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds11 August 20213273485

Newnham Turn Farm, Main Road , Dodford, Daventry, NN7 4SR

without planning permission, the residential use of a mobile home caravan outlined in red on the attached plan

Authority
Daventry District Council *
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Perrins R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: Whether the enforcement notice is valid and properly specifies the alleged breach of planning control and the steps required for compliance
  • Appeal B: Whether the appellant has demonstrated on the balance of probabilities that the residential use of the mobile home/caravan occurred continuously for 10 years or more prior to the application date

What decided it

Appeal A: the enforcement notice failed to specify with sufficient clarity the alleged breach of planning control and the steps required for compliance, rendering it invalid. Appeal B: the appellant's evidence did not establish continuous residential use on the balance of probabilities, being undermined by ambiguities and Council records indicating only occasional occupation.

Judgments cited: Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630; R (Save Woolley Valley Action Group Ltd) v Bath and North East Somerset Council [2012] EWHC 2161 (Admin); Measor v SSETR [1999] JPL 182; Thurrock BC v SSETR and Holding CA [2002] JPL 1278

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.