Planning appeal decision
Land at Former Hatfield Aerodrome, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL4 0HP
Planning appeal 3278097 at Land at Former Hatfield Aerodrome, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL4 0HP (Hertfordshire County Council) was dismissed on 25 January 2022 by Inspector Woolcock J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development conflicts with policy to protect the Green Belt and the effects of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt and upon the purposes of including land within it.
the establishment of a new quarry on land at the former Hatfield Aerodrome, including new access to the A1057, aggregate processing plant, concrete batching plant and other ancillary facilities, together with the importation of inert fill material to restore the mineral workings
- Authority
- Hertfordshire County Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- minerals-waste · Mineral working
- Inspector
- Woolcock J
- Postcode
- AL4 0HP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development conflicts with policy to protect the Green Belt and the effects of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt and upon the purposes of including land within it.
- The effects of the proposed development on hydrogeology and bromate contamination of groundwater.
- The effects of the proposed development on the local amenity of the area and the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular reference to dust, air quality and health, and noise and disturbance.
- The effects of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including cumulative effects.
- Whether the effects of the proposed development on highway safety, flood risk, Public Rights of Way (PRoW), biodiversity, heritage assets or other matters weigh in the planning balance.
- The need for sand and gravel, having regard to likely future demand for, and supply of, these minerals, along with the effects of the proposed development on employment and the economy.
- If the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.
What decided it
The harm by reason of inappropriateness in the Green Belt, together with other identified harms, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of the scheme, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development did not exist.
the substantial harm to the Green Belt, together with harm to character, appearance and amenity, harm to the listed building's setting, and harm to pedestrian safety, was not clearly outweighed by the great-weight benefits of aggregate supply, economic/employment contribution, biodiversity net gain and PRoW improvements, so very special circumstances were not established
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- MLP Policy 1MLP Policy 2MLP Policy 3MLP Policy 4MLP Policy 7MLP Policy 9MLP Policy 11MLP Policy 12MLP Policy 13MLP Policy 14MLP Policy 15MLP Policy 16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 145Paragraph 150Paragraph 188Paragraph 202Paragraph 55
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SoSE (1982) 43 P.&C.R. 233; R (Holborn Studios Ltd) v LB Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] UKSC 3
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hertfordshire County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed12 December 20243345847Cs Recycling , Coopers Lane, Potters Bar, EN6 4NE
- Unknown20 March 20263376105Land Around Brook House , Brook Drive, Radlett, WD7 8ET
- Unknown12 March 20263369840Appeal 3369840
- Unknown3 March 20263363792Appeal 3363792
- Unknown25 February 20263376847Appeal 3376847
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®