®Planning appeal decision
Orchard Lane, PETERBOROUGH, PE8 5EE
described on the application form as ‘proposed 15.0m phase 8 monopole c/w wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works
- Authority
- North Northamptonshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Ollerenshaw M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the proposed location, having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate that the appeal site is the best available option for minimising the effect of the development, and therefore the harm to character and appearance would not be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the proposed location.
Framework references: 114, 117, 118
Plan policies cited: Policy 8(d) of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.