Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 April 20233297918

The Wheatsheaf, 1 High Street South, Rusden, NN10 0QU

the change of use/conversion of the former public house to office use, and part conversion to 3No. one-bedroom residential units; and erection of 3No. one-bedroom two-storey dwellings with associated parking and amenity space

Authority
North Northamptonshire
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Cryan M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Rushden Conservation Area
  • Highway safety, with particular regard to access to and egress from the site, the provision of adequate car parking, and the proposed arrangements for the collection of refuse from the site

What decided it

The proposed refuse collection arrangements would cause significant harm to highway safety by requiring refuse lorries to obstruct the site entrance on a busy road with restricted visibility, and this harm would not be outweighed by the benefits of the scheme.

Framework references: 189, 200, 202, 9, 12

Plan policies cited: Policy 2 of the 2016 North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy, Policy 8 of the 2016 North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy, Policy 3 of the 2016 North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy, Policy 4 of the 2016 North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy, Policy EN1 of the 2018 Rushden Neighbourhood Plan, Policy EN2 of the 2018 Rushden Neighbourhood Plan, Policy T1 of the 2018 Rushden Neighbourhood Plan, Policy DM15 of the Northamptonshire Highway Development Management Strategy 2013

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.