Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld6 February 20243302818

Part of Land at Widhurst Farm , Shoreham Lane, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7BY

the change of use of land to mixed use consisting of a builders yard premises for the processing of builders materials, storage and sales, residential use of mobile homes and caravans, parking, storage, repair, sale of motor vehicles, plant and other equipment

Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
other · Change of use
Inspector
Orr H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Ground (e): whether copies of the notice were not served as required by section 172 and, if so, whether someone has been substantially prejudiced as a result
  • Ground (d): whether the appellant has shown, on the balance of probabilities, that the alleged mixed use had subsisted for a continuous period of ten years prior to the date of the first notice so as to be immune from enforcement action

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the specific mixed use alleged in the notice had continued without material interruption for the full ten-year immunity period.

Judgments cited: Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.