Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld22 May 20253306233

Land at Euridge Manor Farm, Euridge, Colerne, Wiltshire, SN14 8BJ

Planning appeal 3306233 at Land at Euridge Manor Farm, Euridge, Colerne, Wiltshire, SN14 8BJ (Wiltshire Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 22 May 2025 by Inspector Moss J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the location of the development is acceptable, having regard to the relevant policies and guidance on the matter of its location.

described in the application form as the ‘use of land and buildings for events, retention of caravan as accommodation for event guests, formation of new access track for agricultural and events use, formation of new passing place, together with associated landscaping – part retrospective’. Summary

Authority
Wiltshire Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Moss J
Postcode
SN14 8BJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the location of the development is acceptable, having regard to the relevant policies and guidance on the matter of its location
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of nearby residents
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, having regard to its location within the Cotswold National Landscape
  • The effect of the development on highway safety on the surrounding highway network, having regard to the traffic generated by the development
  • Whether or not the development causes detriment to highway safety, having regard to the suitability of the access to the site from the highway

What decided it

Whether the noise, traffic and landscape/ecology effects of the events use could be adequately mitigated by conditions (including a revised noise management plan and access track) so as to render the development acceptable and in accordance with the development plan.

The substantial economic benefits of the development and the finding that its adverse effects on living conditions, character/appearance, highway safety and ecology could be adequately mitigated by conditions led to the conclusion that the development accorded with the development plan, with no material considerations indicating a different determination.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 1Core Policy 20Core Policy 39Core Policy 40Core Policy 48Core Policy 50Core Policy 51Core Policy 57Core Policy 61Policy EB1Policy NE1Policy NE2Policy NE4Policy NE12Policy NE14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 116Paragraph 187Paragraph 190Paragraph 198
Judgments
Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1QB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No.2) [2000] 2 PLR 102; Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; R (oao Developing Retail Limited) v East Hampshire Magistrates' Court [2011] EWHC 618 (Admin); LB Hillingdon Council v SoS Transport [2020] EWCA Civ 1005

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266013838
    Durrington Library, Bulford Road, Durrington, SP4 8EU
  2. Allowed21 October 20266009637
    The Stables, Doctors Hill, Corsham, SN13 8AT
  3. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  4. Notice upheld28 July 20263357040
    The Banks , Lyneham , Wiltshire, SN15 4NT
  5. Dismissed13 July 20266002635
    Castle View Care Centre, 8 Old Castle Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 3SF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.