Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld12 November 20243310495

Land at The Crown & Mitre , Bampton Grange, PENRITH, CA10 2QR

without planning permission the making of a material change in use from use as a public house and inn to a single self-contained holiday let (sui generis)

Authority
Lake District
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Kean G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development serves the interests of the local community in accordance with local and national policies
  • whether the development adequately preserves tourist accommodation
  • the effect of the development on adjacent occupiers

What decided it

The proposal's conflict with the development plan as a whole — through loss of tourist/hotel accommodation and unacceptable harm to neighbours' living conditions — outweighed the limited benefits of the holiday let use.

the limited public benefits of the holiday let use (economic, social and heritage-related) did not outweigh the significant harm from loss of hotel/tourist accommodation, the considerable harm to living conditions of neighbours, and the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, so the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole and permission was refused

Framework references: 84, 93, 212, 208

Plan policies cited: LP Policy 02, LP Policy 06, LP Policy 18, LP Policy 23

Judgments cited: Moore v SSCLG [2012] EWCA Civ 1202; R v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Milne [2000] EWHC 650 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.