Planning appeal decision
Land off Redhill Field Lane, Bilbrough Top, York, YO23 3PP
Change of use of land to a private gypsy site for one family including formation of hardstanding
- Authority
- North Yorkshire Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Merrett R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and development plan policy
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the appeal site is in a sustainable location
- the effect of the development on the living conditions of site occupiers in terms of exposure to pollution
- the effect of the development on the supply of agricultural land
- the effect of the development on biodiversity
- the question of the need for gypsy / traveller sites
- the personal circumstances of the site occupiers
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The combination of the unmet and unquantified need for gypsy/traveller pitches, the lack of any available alternative site, and the appellant family's personal circumstances (particularly the best interests of a child with additional educational needs) was found clearly to outweigh the Green Belt and other harm, establishing very special circumstances.
The harm from inappropriateness in the Green Belt and limited harm to openness was clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to unmet gypsy/traveller need, absence of an alternative site, the Council's policy failure and the appellant's personal circumstances, so that very special circumstances were established and permission granted.
Framework references: 142, 143, 152
Plan policies cited: Policy SP2, Policy SP3, Policy SP11, Policy SP18, Policy SP19, Saved Policy ENV1, Saved Policy ENV2, Saved Policy ENV9, Saved Policy ENV14
Judgments cited: Turner v SSCLG & East Dorset Council [2016]
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®