Planning appeal decision
Nutts Corner Stables , Pingot Lane, Frodsham, WA6 9FA
Planning appeal 3325120 at Nutts Corner Stables , Pingot Lane, Frodsham, WA6 9FA (Cheshire West and Chester) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 17 April 2024 by Inspector Hand S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: There is no dispute the gypsy sites are inappropriate development in the green belt, but the impact on openness and on the landscape is in dispute.
the material change of use of the land from equestrian to a mixed use of equestrian and a residential caravan site for a traveller family with associated domestic structures, amenity block, hardstanding, fencing, entrance pillars and gates and the use of an existing stable building for domestic purposes in connection with the residential use of the site
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Not Applicable
- Inspector
- Hand S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- There is no dispute the gypsy sites are inappropriate development in the green belt, but the impact on openness and on the landscape is in dispute
- The implementation of the Manley Road stables permission
- Impact on the landscape
- Whether the location of the site encourages travel by other than private car
- The impact on the setting of the listed Manley Knoll
- Intentional unauthorised development
- Previously developed land
- Whether there has been a failure of policy
What decided it
The combination of the Council's failure of policy in providing gypsy/traveller sites, the absence of alternative sites, and the appellants' personal circumstances and the best interests of their children tipped the balance in favour of a temporary five-year permission rather than a permanent permission or dismissal.
Substantial/considerable green belt, openness, encroachment and countryside harms, together with intentional unauthorised development, were found to outweigh the case for a permanent permission, but were outweighed for the purposes of a temporary five-year permission by the lack of a 5-year supply of gypsy/traveller sites, absence of alternative sites, the Council's failure of policy, and the great weight attached to the appellants' personal circumstances and the best interests of the children.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- ENV6STRAT9SOC4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 109Paragraph 154
- Judgments
- South Gloucestershire v SSETR & Alvis Brothers ltd [1999] JPL B99; Hussein v SSCLG [2017] EWCA Civ 1060; Commercial Land Ltd v SSTLR & Kensington and Chelsea RBC [2002] EWHC 1264 (Admin); [2003] JPL 358; Lisa Smith v SSLHC & NW Leicestershire Council [2022] EWCA Civ 1291
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed21 October 20266013998Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
- Dismissed16 October 20266012737Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
- Dismissed6 October 20266011029Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
- Dismissed10 September 20266005497Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
- Dismissed10 September 20266005495Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®