Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20243334790

Flat 4, 24 Esplanade, Scarborough, YO11 2AQ

replacement of timber windows with UPVC to the 2 front windows

Authority
North Yorkshire Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
McDonagh C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the listed building or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Scarborough Conservation Area

What decided it

The incompatibility of uPVC material with the historic and architectural integrity of the listed building, combined with the absence of evidence justifying wholesale window replacement, means the proposal fails to preserve the special interest of the designated heritage asset and cannot be justified by the modest public benefits claimed.

Framework references: 205, 208, 164

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.