Planning appeal decision
Stampwell Farm, Oxford Road, Jordans, Buckinghamshire, HP9 2DX
Planning appeal 3335970 at Stampwell Farm, Oxford Road, Jordans, Buckinghamshire, HP9 2DX (Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 4 March 2025 by Inspector Harbottle M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the MCU is inappropriate development within the Green Belt (GB) having regard to the effect on the openness and purposes of including land in the GB and, as necessary, sustainable development principles and the effect on the setting of designated heritage assets.
Without planning permission, a material change of use of the land to a mixed use comprising agriculture, residential, coffee bean processing, community facility for worship and leisure purposes and integral to that use, operational development comprising the erection of a marquee and play equipment
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- community-institutional · Change of use
- Inspector
- Harbottle M
- Postcode
- HP9 2XD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the MCU is inappropriate development within the Green Belt (GB) having regard to the effect on the openness and purposes of including land in the GB and, as necessary, sustainable development principles and the effect on the setting of designated heritage assets.
- The suitability of the vehicular access from Oxford Road.
- Any support provided to the rural economy.
- If the MCU constitutes inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, and so amounts to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal ("the GB balance").
What decided it
The worship use failed criteria b and c of paragraph 155 (no demonstrable unmet need and an unsustainable location for non-car access) and so remained inappropriate Green Belt development without very special circumstances, whereas the coffee bean processing use in an existing building was not inappropriate development.
The private benefit of the rural/agricultural link to the church's worship did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development and the harm arising from poor transport accessibility, so the worship use was refused, while the coffee bean processing use, complying with the development plan, was permitted.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- GB2GB29CS19CS1CS4CS29TR2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 110Paragraph 115
- Judgments
- Wealden DC v SSE & Innocent [1983] JPL 234; Avon Estates Ltd v Welsh Ministers & Ceredigion CC [2011] EWCA Civ 553
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice upheld23 April 20263377177Land Adjacent Porch House, Village Road, Coleshill, Buckinghamshire
- Dismissed1 April 20263372329118 Chalfont Road, Seer Green, Beaconsfield, HP9 2QP
- Notice varied and upheld12 March 20263325136Fenton Civil Engineering Ltd, Rowan Tree Farm Blackwell Hall Lane, Ley Hill, Chesham, HP5 1UN
- Quashed On Legal Grounds9 March 20263341531Lodge Farm , 100 Lodge Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, HP8 4AH
- Unknown2 March 20263362050Land at National Society for Epilepsy, Chesham Lane, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®