Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 September 20243341906

Old Manor Stables, Back Lane, Barkston Ash, Nr Tadcaster, LS24 9PL

10 x 6 shed to house garden equipment to maintain land on the property

Authority
North Yorkshire Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dowsett J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the setting of nearby listed buildings.

What decided it

The shed's small scale and severely restricted visibility from the public domain meant it caused no harm to the character and appearance of the area or to the setting of the nearby listed buildings.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy SP18, Policy SP19, Policy SP3

Judgments cited: Methuen-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525; R (oao) Hampshire CC v Blackbushe Airport Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 398; Egerton v Taunton Deane Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2752 (Admin); Debenhams Plc v Westminster City Council [1986] 12 WLUK 44 (HL); Her Majesty's Attorney General at the relation of Robin Sutcliffe, John Rouse, and Tony Hughes v Calderdale Borough Council [1983] JPL 310; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2001] QB 59; Dyer v Dorset County Council [1989] 1 QB 346; Warwick DC v SSLUHC, Mr J Storer & Mrs A Lowe [2022] WHC 2145 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.