Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 November 20243345844

Tarn Bank, Greysouthen, Cumberland, CA13 0AL

bale storage shed

Authority
Cumberland
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Manchester S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether there is a demonstrable agricultural need for the proposals in connection with a viable farming business sufficient to justify development in the open countryside
  • the effect of the proposals on the rural character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The absence of demonstrable agricultural need for the bale storage building proportionate to a viable farming business, combined with the significant harm to rural character and appearance that would result from the scale, design and siting of the development.

The limited renewable energy benefits from solar panels on the proposed buildings did not outweigh the significant harm to rural character and appearance and the conflict with development plan policies requiring development in the countryside to be proportionate to viable farming enterprises.

Framework references: 88

Plan policies cited: Policy S3, Policy S14, Policy DM6, Policy S2, Policy S32, Policy S33

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.