Planning appeal decision
216 London Road, Twickenham, TW1 1EU
Planning appeal 3347022 at 216 London Road, Twickenham, TW1 1EU (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 12 June 2026 by Inspector Bond V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the change of use commenced before 15 May 2020 such that enforcement action was time-barred under section 174(2)(d).
Without planning permission and within the last four years, a material change of use of the building from a single family dwellinghouse into five self-contained flats, facilitated by the erection of a part two-storey part single-storey rear extension: insertion of rooflights and alterations to fenestration arrangement on all elevations
- Appeal type
- minor · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Bond V
- Postcode
- TW1 1EU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the change of use commenced before 15 May 2020 such that enforcement action was time-barred under section 174(2)(d)
- Whether the requirements of the notice exceed what is necessary under section 174(2)(f)
- Whether the period for compliance is reasonable under section 174(2)(g)
What decided it
The change of use did not commence before the material date of 15 May 2020 because, despite physical completion and Council tax registration by 1 March 2020, the three-week vacancy before first occupation on 5 June 2020, combined with insufficient evidence of intended or attempted use during that period, meant the use was not established before the immunity period began to run.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- FSS v Arun DC & Brown [2006] EWCA Civ 1172; Moore v SSE & New Forest DC (1999) 77 P.&C.R. 114; Thurrock BC v SSETR & Holding [2002] EWCA Civ 226; Jones v Isle of Anglesey CC [2024] EWHC 2582 (Admin); Gravesham BC v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982) 47 P&CR 142; Impey v Secretary of State for the Environment (1984) 47 P&CR 157; Welwyn Hatfield Council BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice varied and upheld29 September 20263365429The Anglers Hotel, 3 Broom Road, Teddington, TW11 9NR
- Dismissed21 July 20263358690Mears Walk, Riverside, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 6UJ
- Dismissed21 July 20263353018Cambridge Gardens, Clevedon Rd, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 2TA
- Allowed21 July 20263348966River Thames Visitor Centre, Riverside, Richmond, TW10 6UJ
- Notice varied and upheld13 March 2026334248650 Staines Rd, Twickenham, TW2 5AH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®