Planning appeal decision
Land East of Trago Farm, East Taphouse, Liskeard , Cornwall , PL14 4NH
Planning appeal 3347999 at Land East of Trago Farm, East Taphouse, Liskeard , Cornwall , PL14 4NH (Cornwall Council) was dismissed on 19 February 2025 by Inspector Graham J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect upon the character and appearance of the area.
Change of use of land from agriculture to a private Gypsy Site of five pitches (5 mobile homes, 5 touring caravans, 5 utility buildings and associated works); linked enforcement appeal against the material change of use from agricultural to residential (Gypsy Site) already carried out in a different layout
- Authority
- Cornwall Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Graham J
- Postcode
- PL14 4NH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect upon the character and appearance of the area
- whether the development would dominate the nearest settled community
- the accessibility of the site by sustainable modes of transport
- the impact on nearby Heritage Assets
- the need for Gypsy and Traveller sites, and the availability of suitable alternative sites
- the personal circumstances of the Appellant and other occupiers, and the best interests of the children
What decided it
The difference in heritage harm caused by the two layouts — less than substantial harm from the proposed layout versus substantial harm to the listed hedgebanks from the existing layout on top of the former access — determined that the presumption in favour of sustainable development applied to the Planning Appeal but was disapplied for the Enforcement Appeal.
For the Planning Appeal, the substantial unmet need for pitches, lack of suitable alternatives and the children's best interests outweighed the less-than-substantial heritage and landscape harm under the tilted balance; for the Enforcement Appeal, the substantial harm to the listed hedgebanks provided a strong reason disapplying the presumption, and under the ordinary balance the conflict with the development plan was not outweighed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 11Policy 12Policy 23Policy 24Policy 2Policy 2aPolicy 3Policy 4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 215Paragraph 214
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cornwall
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed28 October 20266006769Wayside Barn, Field Opposite Lower Reen Farm, Reen, Perranporth, TR6 0AL
- Dismissed22 October 2026601210941 Gwithian Towans, Gwithian, TR27 5BT
- Notice upheld16 September 20263363841Sand Sea and Surf, Wharf Road, St.Ives, TR26 1LF
- Dismissed27 August 20266002971Prow Park Business Village, Treloggan Industrial Estate, Newquay, TR7 2SX
- Allowed11 August 20266003039Land to the North and South of Trerice Farmhouse, Trerice Dairy Farm and Green Meadows, St Dennis, St. Austell, PL26 8EG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®