Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld23 July 20263348067

51 Charnley Road, BLACKPOOL, FY1 4PE

without planning permission, the material change of use of 51 Charnley Road from a guest-house to a self-contained holiday let

Authority
Blackpool Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Savage M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the current use of the property falls within use class C1 or constitutes a material change of use (ground c)
  • Whether the material change of use occurred more than 10 years before the enforcement notice was issued and continued without significant interruption (ground d)
  • The effect of the appeal scheme on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants (ground a)
  • The effect of the appeal scheme on the character of the area (ground a)
  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme, having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning tourism (ground a)

What decided it

The absence of on-site management, combined with the property being booked out as a whole to large groups with unrestricted access to all parts of the property and minimal provision of prepared meals or services, means the current use cannot fairly be described as a guest house (C1 use) and therefore constitutes a material change of use for which planning permission is required and should be refused due to harm to neighbouring living conditions and character of the area.

The moderate benefits to the local economy from employment and visitor spending were outweighed by the significant harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants through noise and disturbance and harm to the character of the area, with the fallback position of a C1 guest house use being significantly less harmful.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM36, Policy CS7, Policy CS21, Policy CS23

Judgments cited: R (Davison) v Elmbridge BC [2020] 1 P & CR 1; Moore v SoS for Communities and Local Government [2012] EWCA Civ 1202; Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15; Gravesham and Mayflower Cambridge Limited v Secretary of State for the Environment (1975) 30 P&CR 29; Winmill & Another v Secretary of State for the Environment & Another [1981] Lexis Citation 300; Breachberry Limited v Secretary of State for the Environment and another [1984] Lexis Citation 528; Lewis v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another (1972) 23 P. & C.R. 125; Empire Communications Limited and Anor v SSHCLG [2026] EWHC 817 (Admin); Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.