Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20253350065

Clints Quarry, Moota, Lake District National Park, CA13 0QE

the winning and working of limestone

Authority
Lake District
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
minerals-waste · Unknown
Inspector
Savage M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the Authority's decision to refuse the application was well founded, turning on whether the 1974 planning permission was begun prior to 20 November 1979
  • Appeal B: whether, if the 1974 permission was found not to have been implemented, it is possible to determine the conditions for the 1966 permission alone

What decided it

The appellant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the 1974 permission had been lawfully begun, and separately failed to demonstrate that working the 1966 permission beyond its conditioned limits would not adversely affect the integrity of the Clints Quarry SAC or that no alternative solutions or imperative reasons of overriding public interest existed.

The public interest benefits of the proposal (economic benefits, job retention, reduced transport mileage) did not outweigh the adverse impacts on the conservation aims of the Habitats Directive, so the benefits did not justify those adverse impacts.

Framework references: 190

Judgments cited: David (Thomas)(Porthcawl) Ltd v Penybont Rural District Council [1972] 3 All E.R. 1092, CA; R (Park Pharmacy Trust) v Plymouth City Council [2008] EWHC 445 (Admin); Maximums Networks Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2018] EWHC 1933 (Admin); Foster, R (on the application of) v Oldham MBC & Pugmanor Properties Ltd [1999] EWHC Admin 774; Test Valley Borough Council v Fiske [2024] EWCA Civ 1541; CG Fry & Son Limited v (1) Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (2) Somerset Council [2024] EWCA Civ 730; R (Wilkinson) v South Hams DC [2016] EWHC 1860

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.