Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 July 20253359973

Gill Moor Farm, Bowes Green House To Moorfield House, Bishop Thornton, North Yorkshire, HG3 3LE

the demolition of existing buildings and erection of 1no. residential dwelling with associated infrastructure and landscaping

Authority
North Yorkshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Nilsson A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether, having regard to development plan policy, the appeal site would be a sustainable location for housing development
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants with regard to amenity space provision

What decided it

The adverse impacts of the proposed development not being in a sustainable location, combined with limited to minor harm to character and appearance, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery, even in the context of the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

The benefits of housing delivery and economic contribution, together with the fallback position, were given significant weight but were outweighed by the greater significant weight attached to the adverse impacts of unsustainability and harm to character and appearance

Framework references: 84, 115, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy GS2, Policy GS3, Policy NE4

Judgments cited: Braintree District Council v SSCLG & Ors [2017] EWHC 2743 (Admin); Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.