Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 July 20263367251

13 Sherwood Road, Tideswell, BUXTON, SK17 8HS

siting of caravan to provide additional accommodation for family of homeowners

Authority
Peak District
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Phillips A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed caravan meets the definition of a 'caravan' pursuant to section 29 of the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960 as qualified by Section 13(1) of the Caravan Sites Act 1968
  • whether the caravan would be for a purpose incidental to the enjoyment of the dwelling and would not create a separate dwelling independent of the existing residential unit

What decided it

The proposed caravan failed to meet the statutory definition of a caravan because the evidence did not demonstrate it could be moved without significant structural damage, and the proposed use was not reasonably incidental to the normal use of the dwellinghouse.

Judgments cited: Brightlingsea Haven Ltd v Morris [2008] EWHC 1928 (QB); Byrne v SSE & Arun DC [1998] JPL 122

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.