Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20253371107

The Kings Arms, 59 High Street, Thrapston, NN14 4JJ

proposed demolition of curtilage warehouse structure and formation of parking area, proposed change of use of attached courtyard dwellings to form part of public house, proposed demolition of single storey lean-to extensions, extension to existing bar area and extension to form café/restaurant

Authority
North Northamptonshire
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Unknown
Inspector
Jones RE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the special interest of a Grade II listed building – the Kings Arms Public House, the setting of a Grade II* listed building the Church of St James, the setting of the Grade II listed buildings Nos 47, 49 and 51 High Street and Nos 53 and 55 High Street, and the character and appearance of the Thrapston Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety in the locality with particular reference to parking arrangements and traffic volumes on the local road network

What decided it

The considerable harm to the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and the setting of the Church of St James, assessed as less than substantial but at the mid-point of that spectrum, could not be outweighed by the identified public benefits of the scheme.

Framework references: 212, 213, 214, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy 8 of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2034, Policy 2 of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2034, Policy EN12 of the East Northamptonshire Local Plan Part 2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.