Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed15 June 20263373278

Land South of Snarlton Farm, Snarlton Lane, Melksham, Wiltshire, SN12 7QP

Planning appeal 3373278 at Land South of Snarlton Farm, Snarlton Lane, Melksham, Wiltshire, SN12 7QP (Wiltshire Council) was allowed on 15 June 2026 by Inspector Wilders B, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development.

Outline planning application with all matters reserved except for two pedestrian and vehicle accesses (excluding internal estate roads) from Eastern Way, for the erection of up to 300 dwellings (Class C3); land for local community use or building (incorporating Classes E(b), E(g) and F2(b) and (c)); open space and dedicated play space and service infrastructure and associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wilders B
Postcode
SN12 7QP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development
  • If not, whether the proposal would result in any other harm, with particular regard to landscape and BMV
  • Whether the Council can currently demonstrate a five-year housing land supply and if not, the extent of the shortfall
  • Any benefits of the proposal and the weight to be given to them
  • If the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, whether the adverse impacts of granting planning permission significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, taking into account the recently made NP and the wording of paragraph 14

What decided it

the very significant shortfall in five-year housing land supply (2.16 years) and acute affordable housing need meant that the benefits of housing delivery, taken with the uncertainty over the JMNP2 housing requirement following withdrawal of the emerging Local Plan, were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harms, including conflict with the neighbourhood plan.

significant weight given to market and affordable housing, and moderate weight to other social, economic, drainage and biodiversity benefits, were found to outweigh the limited weight given to landscape harm and conflict with out-of-date development plan policies and the moderate weight given to loss of BMV land, such that the adverse impacts of allowing development conflicting with the neighbourhood plan did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
WCS Policy CP1WCS Policy CP2WCS Policy CP15WCS Policy CP43WCS Policy CP45WCS Policy CP51WCS Policy CP52WCS Policy CP57WCS Policy CP58WCS Policy CP60WCS Policy CP61WCS Policy CP67JMNP2 Policy 3JMNP2 Policy 6JMNP2 Policy 11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 13Paragraph 14Paragraph 15Paragraph 48Paragraph 49Paragraph 57Paragraph 58Paragraph 61Paragraph 69Paragraph 70Paragraph 78Paragraph 135Paragraph 187Paragraph 188Paragraph 207Paragraph 216Paragraph 232
Judgments
City of Edinburgh v Secretary of State for Scotland and Others [1997] UKHL 38; [1998] 1 All ER 174; [1997] 1 WLR 1447; Tesco Stores Limited v Dundee City Council [2012] UKSC 13; R v Rochdale MBC, ex parte Milne [2000] EWHC 650 (Admin); R (on the application of Hampton Bishop Parish Council) v Herefordshire Council [2014] EWCA Civ 878; Corbett v Cornwall Council [2020] EWCA Civ 508; Suffolk Coastal DC v Hopkins Homes; Richborough Estates v Cheshire East [2017] UKSC 37; R (Corbett) v The Cornwall Council [2020] EWCA Civ 508

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266007352
    Land to the East of New Road, Melksham, SN12 7QZ
  3. Allowed23 June 20266006895
    Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
  4. Allowed17 June 20266003895
    86-87 Kington St Michael, Kington St Michael, SN14 6HX
  5. Allowed13 May 20266002151
    Land at Chantry Cottage, Semley Common, Semley, Shaftesbury, SP7 9AP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.