Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 March 20263375041

15 West Bank, Carlton, GOOLE, DN14 9PZ

change of use of existing cattery building to self build residential dwelling

Authority
North Yorkshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Duff N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location, having regard to relevant planning policies relating to the re-use of existing buildings in the countryside

What decided it

The proposal would result in an isolated dwelling in the countryside that would not re-use a redundant or disused building and would not enhance its immediate setting, contrary to Paragraph 84 c) of the Framework, and this harm significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest housing and economic benefits even under the tilted balance.

The harm arising from the isolated countryside location and failure to meet Paragraph 84 c) of the Framework (significant weight) and conflict with Policies H12 and SP1 (limited weight) significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest social and economic benefits of one additional dwelling, previously developed land recycling, and temporary construction benefits (all limited weight), such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 84, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy H12 of the Selby District Local Plan 2005, Policy SP2 of the Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan, Policy SP1 of the Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan, Policy SP15 of the Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan, Policy SP18 of the Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan, Policy SP19 of the Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan, Policy ENV1 of the Selby District Local Plan 2005, Policy T1 of the Selby District Local Plan 2005, Policy T2 of the Selby District Local Plan 2005

Judgments cited: Braintree District Council v SSCLG & Ors [2017] EWHC 2743 (Admin); Corbett v Cornwall Council [2022] EWCA Civ 1069

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.