Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision23 July 20263377789

44 Hill Rise, Greenford, UB6 8PB

Planning appeal 3377789 at 44 Hill Rise, Greenford, UB6 8PB (London Borough of Ealing) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 23 July 2026 by Inspector Hanson S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the operational development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling, the semi-detached pair, and the surrounding area.

Without planning permission: The removal of the front bay windows and erection of a two storey front extension and porch; the erection of a part single storey, part two storey rear/side (wrap around) extension; alteration of roof from hip to gable end; rear roof extension and the material change of use of the resulting property to 8 self -contained flats

Appeal type
minor · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hanson S
Postcode
UB6 8PB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the operational development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling, the semi-detached pair, and the surrounding area
  • the effect of the material change of use to eight self-contained flats on the living conditions of occupiers, with particular regard to internal space standards, outlook and amenity provision

What decided it

The eight self-contained flats fell substantially below London Plan Policy D6 minimum internal space standards, resulting in unacceptable living conditions for occupiers that were not outweighed by other material considerations.

the benefits of affordable, efficient use of the existing building did not outweigh the significant conflict with development plan living-condition standards, so permission for the change of use to 8 flats was refused, while the operational development was found to accord with the development plan and was permitted

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D6Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7.4Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7BEaling Development Management DPD Policy 3.5Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7DDraft Ealing Local Plan Policy DAA
Judgments
Commercial Land Limited and another v SSTLGR and another [2002] EWHC 1264 (Admin); Atwill, R (On the Application Of) v New Forest National Park Authority [2023] EWHC 625 (Admin); Hillside Parks Limited v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30; Thayer v SSE 1991 WL 838530; [1992] JPL 264; Tapecrown Limited v The First Secretary of State and another [2006] EWCA Civ 1744; Ahmed v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2014] EWCA Civ 566; Bhandal v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities & Local Government and another [2020] EWHC 2724 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

207 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  2. Quashed On Legal Grounds3 September 20263378189
    25 Scorton Avenue, Perivale, UB6 8LA
  3. Notice upheld26 August 20263376041
    Tiramisu Cafe, 12 St. Marys Road, London, W5 5ES
  4. Notice upheld26 August 20263358322
    95 Greatdown Road, London, W7 1JR
  5. Notice upheld24 August 20263367676
    1 Kennedy Road, Hanwell, London, W7 1JL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.