Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 July 20266003022

Land Located South of Old Rickyard Piece, New Road, Weston Turville, HP22 5ZD

Erection of 51 dwellings each with parking spaces and private gardens, along with new roads and landscaping

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council
Appeal type
major · Planning
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential
Postcode
HP22 5ZD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the mix of housing would reflect the local need
  • the effect of the development on biodiversity, with particular regard to, i) on-site protected species – specifically considering breeding birds, badgers, roosting bats and foraging and commuting bats, and ii) whether the biodiversity net gain condition is capable of being discharged
  • whether the scheme would accord with the local development strategy, with particular regard to connectivity to the wider green infrastructure network
  • whether the development would make suitable provision for affordable housing, public transport, primary health care, primary and secondary education, publicly accessible green space and play provision, sport and leisure provision, and highway mitigation measures
  • if conflict with the development plan would arise, whether any such conflict would be outweighed by material considerations

What decided it

Insufficient survey evidence meant the effect of the development on foraging/commuting bats and breeding birds could not be properly assessed, and this unresolved harm, combined with conflict with the development plan as a whole, was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.

the adverse impacts of granting permission, including substantial weight given to unresolved harm to protected species and conflict with the development plan as a whole, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and other advantages, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply

Framework references: 11, 58, 73

Plan policies cited: Policy NE4, Policy BE2, Policy H2, Policy H6a, Policy NE1, Policy NE8, Policy D-AGT4, Policy S5, Policy I1, Policy I2, Policy I3, Policy L3, Policy H1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.