Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20266004762

1 St Marys Avenue, Wanstead, E11 2NR

subdivision of rear garden and redevelopment of existing two storey outbuilding to create 1no. 2 bedroom dwellinghouse with associated garden and car parking space. Formation of means of access to a highway and dropped kerb to front of No. 1 St Marys Avenue

Authority
Redbridge
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
E11 2NR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the significance of the Wanstead Village CA
  • the effect of the proposed development on the significance of the Wanstead Park CA, with regard to its setting
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to the provision of internal space and outdoor amenity space

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the Wanstead Village Conservation Area, which was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, combined with the failure to demonstrate acceptable internal space standards for future occupiers.

The limited public benefits of delivering one additional 2-bedroom dwelling and housing supply contribution were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the significance of the Wanstead Village Conservation Area and the failure to meet internal space standards, with heritage protection policies providing a strong reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 202, 212, 215

Plan policies cited: LP26, LP33, LP29, HC1, D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.