Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 August 20266005682

343-453 Latimer Industrial Estate, Unit 9, Latimer Road, London, W10 6RQ

demolition of existing building and redevelopment for a five storey building comprising flexible Class E floorspace and seven residential units with associated landscaping, cycle parking and other works incidental to the application proposal

Authority
Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
W10 6RQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including on the significance of the nearby Oxford Gardens – St Quintin Conservation Area (the CA), a designated heritage asset, through development within its setting
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to privacy, outlook, daylight, sunlight, noise and disturbance
  • whether the proposed development would make an appropriate contribution toward highway improvements, carbon off-setting, air quality, tree planting, car-free housing, employment and skills, local procurement strategy, monitoring of energy demand and public art

What decided it

The completion of a unilateral undertaking securing the necessary planning obligations, combined with the acceptable design and layout that would not cause unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions or the conservation area setting, allowed the appeal to be determined in accordance with the development plan.

The benefits of delivering seven residential units on suitable brownfield land within a settlement, contributing to housing supply where delivery was substantially below requirement, and providing mixed-use regeneration of an underutilised employment site, outweighed the minor change in scale and character of the site, which was acceptable in context and mitigated by design.

Framework references: 11, 125

Plan policies cited: Policy SA9 KCLP, Policy CD1 KCLP, Policy CD2 KCLP, Policy CD4 KCLP, Policy CD9 KCLP, Policy CD10 KCLP, Policy CD12 KCLP, Policy CD15 KCLP, Policy GB7 KCLP, Policy GB8 KCLP, Policy GB10 KCLP, Policy LR1 St Quintin and Woodlands Neighbourhood Plan, Policy LR5 St Quintin and Woodlands Neighbourhood Plan, Policy E2 St Quintin and Woodlands Neighbourhood Plan, Objective 8 St Quintin and Woodlands Neighbourhood Plan, Policy D1 The London Plan, Policy D3 The London Plan, Policy D4 The London Plan, Policy D5 The London Plan, Policy D6 The London Plan, Policy D14 The London Plan, Policy IP1 The London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.