Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 July 20266007524

Clematis Cottage, Lower icknield Way, Great Kimble, Aylesbury, HP17 9TX

redevelopment of existing residential property to provide between 1 and 4 dwellings

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
HP17 9TX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site would be in a suitable location with regard to relevant development plan policies, including the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the site would be in a suitable location with regard to access to services and facilities
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The Council's significant shortfall in five-year housing land supply (1.98 years) engages the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework, and the benefits of housing delivery outweigh the conflict with development plan policies directing development to settlement boundaries.

The adverse impacts of the proposal's location outside the settlement boundary and conflict with local plan and neighbourhood plan policies would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, particularly given the Council's housing land supply shortfall and the proposal's contribution to housing delivery and accordance with Framework objectives for well-designed places and effective use of land.

Framework references: 11, 14, 73, 78, 129, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy CP2, Policy CP3, Policy CP12, Policy DM21, Policy DM33, Policy DM44, Policy RUR6, Policy KIM1, Policy KIM3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.