Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 August 20266008807

96 Upwood Road, Lee, SE12 8AN

the demolition of garden shed, construction of an outbuilding to be used as a gym ancillary to the main dwelling house, construction of a part 1, part 2 storey side and rear wrap around extension, installation of solar panels and rooflights, construction of a front porch with associated works. without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 25/3303/HD, dated 17 December 2025

Authority
Greenwich
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
SE12 8AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed ground floor element of the side extension on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area

What decided it

The visual coalescence of the proposed ground floor extension with the front porch, caused by their alignment and shared roof, would destroy the porch as a discrete element and harm the coherent suburban character of the street.

The benefits to the occupiers from providing additional secure bicycle storage and space for a domestic workshop did not outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area

Plan policies cited: Policy DH1, Policy DH(a), Policy HD2, Policy HD3, Policy D3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.