Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld6 July 20223210244

Land at Rapiers, Little London Road, Silchester , Hampshire , RG7 2PP

Planning appeal 3210244 at Land at Rapiers, Little London Road, Silchester , Hampshire , RG7 2PP (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 July 2022 by Inspector Steen A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development protects and enhances valued landscapes or recognises the intrinsic character and beauty of the landscape.

without planning permission: 3.1 The material change of use of the Land from agricultural to a residential caravan site. 3.2 The siting of mobile homes/caravans for residential occupation on the Land. 3.3 The laying of hard standing and sub base

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Steen A
Postcode
RG7 2PP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development protects and enhances valued landscapes or recognises the intrinsic character and beauty of the landscape
  • whether the development affects ecology and biodiversity in the area
  • the effect of traffic relating to the caravan site on the safe and efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site and the use of public rights of way
  • whether occupiers of the residentially occupied caravans would enjoy satisfactory living conditions, having particular regard to noise and odours
  • the effect of the development on flood risk
  • whether the caravan site is in a suitable location in terms of its location in respect to adjacent settlements, services and facilities
  • whether there are other material considerations that could outweigh any conflict with development plan policies, such as the need for gypsy and traveller accommodation within the District and the personal circumstances of the appellant and other site occupiers

What decided it

The cumulative harm to landscape, ecology, highway safety, living conditions and flood risk, amounting to conflict with the development plan, was not outweighed by the need for gypsy and traveller accommodation or the personal circumstances of the prospective occupiers.

Great weight attached to conflict with the development plan (landscape, ecology, highway safety, living conditions and flood risk harms) plus modest weight against the intentional unauthorised nature of the development were not outweighed by the considerable weight given to the need for gypsy and traveller accommodation and the personal circumstances of prospective occupiers, including the best interests of children.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EM1Policy EM7Policy EM10Policy EM12Policy CN5Policy CN9Policy SS3.9Policy SS3.10Policy SS3.11Policy SS3.12
Judgments
Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council v William Connors & Ors [2018] EWHC 0011 (QB)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

40 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed26 October 20266007550
    75 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
  2. Notice varied and upheld14 September 20263369273
    Flats 1 to 4, 51 & 53 Alexandra Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7RQ
  3. Notice upheld1 September 20263350252
    16 Avon Road, Oakley, Basingstoke, RG23 7DJ
  4. Allowed10 July 20266004025
    Basingstoke Sports and Social Club, Fairfields Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3DR
  5. Allowed26 May 20263375485
    Land North Of Whitchurch Station, Whitchurch, RG28 7ED

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.