Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted17 March 20233210851

Land to the R/O the Meadows, Lenham Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LG

Planning appeal 3210851 at Land to the R/O the Meadows, Lenham Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LG (Maidstone Borough Council) was allowed on 17 March 2023 by Inspector Lewis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on landscape character and the appearance of the land and the surrounding countryside (both as an individual site and cumulatively).

Continued use of land beyond expiry of time-limited conditions for gypsy/traveller caravan pitches: EN1 - stationing of a mobile home and two touring caravans with utility room and hardstanding; EN2 and EN3 - use of land as residential to provide 5 plots each for gypsy families with mobile homes, touring caravans and utility blocks

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Lewis D
Postcode
TN27 9LG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on landscape character and the appearance of the land and the surrounding countryside (both as an individual site and cumulatively)
  • The effect on the local settled community, including the amenity of neighbouring landowners
  • Whether any identified harm may be suitably mitigated through compliance with planning conditions
  • The existing level of local provision and the need for traveller sites
  • The personal need for a site by the appellants and the current occupiers, taking account of their personal circumstances, human rights (including the best interests of the child), protected characteristics and the availability (or lack) of alternative accommodation
  • Whether the period for compliance stated in the enforcement notice is reasonable and proportionate (ground (g))

What decided it

The balance between the significant landscape harm from the scale, siting and intensification of each site and the substantial need-related and personal/Article 8 considerations of current occupiers, which was tipped in favour of permission only where the site could be reduced to a smaller, better-integrated form.

For EN1 the limited landscape/visual harm was outweighed by unmet Traveller need and personal circumstances, so full permission was granted; for EN2 and EN3 the harm across the whole sites was not outweighed and a further temporary permission was rejected, but on reduced parts of each site (Plots 4 and 5 on EN2; Plots 8A, 8B and 9A on EN3) the reduced harm was outweighed by need, social/cultural well-being benefits and Article 8 rights, while the harm on the remaining land was not outweighed and permission was refused there.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS 1Policy SP 17Policy DM 15Policy DM 30Policy GT1Policy DM16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 56
Judgments
Smith v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Others [2022] EWCA Civ 1391; Smith v FSS and Mid Bedfordshire Borough Council [2005] EWCA Civ 859

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

64 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds28 September 20263378504
    Pear View, Symonds Lane, Yalding, Kent, ME18 6HA
  2. Notice upheld17 July 20263377356
    Stephens Bridge Field, Water Lane, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent, TN27 9JP
  3. Planning permission granted22 June 20263377362
    Lenwood, Polhill Lane, Harrietsham, Maidstone, Kent, ME17 1LG
  4. Planning permission granted10 June 20263347386
    Land at The Meadows, Lenham Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LG
  5. Notice varied and upheld24 April 20263364740
    5 Bower Place, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 8BG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.