Planning appeal decision
Land to the R/O the Meadows, Lenham Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LG
Planning appeal 3210854 at Land to the R/O the Meadows, Lenham Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LG (Maidstone Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 17 March 2023 by Inspector Lewis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on landscape character and the appearance of the land and the surrounding countryside (both as an individual site and cumulatively).
Use of land for stationing of mobile homes, touring caravans and utility blocks for gypsy/traveller families on three sites, in breach of time-limited conditions attached to earlier temporary planning permissions
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Lewis D
- Postcode
- TN27 9LG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on landscape character and the appearance of the land and the surrounding countryside (both as an individual site and cumulatively).
- The effect on the local settled community, including the amenity of neighbouring landowners.
- Whether any identified harm may be suitably mitigated through compliance with planning conditions.
- The existing level of local provision and the need for traveller sites.
- The personal need for a site by the appellants and the current occupiers, taking account of their personal circumstances, human rights (including the best interests of the child), protected characteristics and the availability (or lack) of alternative accommodation.
- Whether the period for compliance stated in the enforcement notice is reasonable and proportionate.
What decided it
The extent to which landscape and visual harm from each part of the sites could be sufficiently reduced by conditions and site-planning to be outweighed by the significant unmet need for Traveller pitches and the personal/Article 8 circumstances of occupiers.
The need for Traveller pitches and the personal/Article 8 circumstances of occupiers outweighed the landscape and visual harm on the small EN1 site and on the least harmful, more compact parts of the EN2 and EN3 sites, but did not outweigh the harm on the remainder of the larger sites, where the balance remained against the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS 1Policy SP 17Policy DM 15Policy DM 30Policy GT1Policy DM16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56
- Judgments
- Smith v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Others [2022] EWCA Civ 1391; Smith v FSS and Mid Bedfordshire Borough Council [2005] EWCA Civ 859
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Quashed On Legal Grounds28 September 20263378504Pear View, Symonds Lane, Yalding, Kent, ME18 6HA
- Notice upheld17 July 20263377356Stephens Bridge Field, Water Lane, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent, TN27 9JP
- Planning permission granted22 June 20263377362Lenwood, Polhill Lane, Harrietsham, Maidstone, Kent, ME17 1LG
- Planning permission granted10 June 20263347386Land at The Meadows, Lenham Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LG
- Notice varied and upheld24 April 202633647405 Bower Place, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 8BG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®