Planning appeal decision
Land at Mickleden Edge, Midhope Moor, Bradfield, South Yorkshire, S36 4GX
Planning appeal 3215789 at Land at Mickleden Edge, Midhope Moor, Bradfield, South Yorkshire, S36 4GX (Peak District) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 8 November 2021 by Inspector Dignan P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The impact on the landscape and scenic beauty of the National Park.
without planning permission, engineering operations consisting of the laying of geotextile matting and wooden log rafts on the land to form a track
- Authority
- Peak District
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Dignan P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The impact on the landscape and scenic beauty of the National Park.
- Whether the development is permissible in the Natural Zone.
- Whether the development has implications for biodiversity.
What decided it
The unresolved conflict with development plan policies protecting landscape character, the Natural Zone and biodiversity, including a credible risk to qualifying habitat features that could not be ruled out, outweighed the limited benefits of retaining the track.
The harm to landscape character and scenic beauty, conflict with Natural Zone policy, and the credible risk to biodiversity features outweighed the limited and uncertain benefits of retaining the track (including possible future restoration use and wildfire access), so the appeal on ground (a) failed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GSP1Policy GSP2Policy L1Policy DMC1Policy DMC2Policy L2Policy DMC11Policy DMC12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 176
- Judgments
- McKay v Secretary of State for the Environment and others, [1994] JPL 806; South Hams DC v Halsey [1996] JPL 761; Mr Felix Cash v Wokingham BC [2014] EWHC 3748 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Peak District
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice upheld23 July 20263364767Land Adjacent to B6054, East of Owler Bar, Holmesfield, S17 3BP
- Notice varied and upheld6 May 20263372929Land Adjacent to B6051 and A621 South of Owler Bar, Horsleygate Road, Owler Bar, Holmesfield, Sheffield, S17 3BP
- Notice varied and upheld2 February 20263364823Cornfield Barn, Lyme Handley, Whaley Bridge, High Peak, SK23 7BT
- Quashed On Legal Grounds21 January 20253346264Manor House, Little Hucklow, Buxton, SK17 8RT
- Notice upheld17 January 20253345215The Bank House Bar & Restaurant Ltd, Bank House Main Road, Hathersage, Hope Valley, S32 1BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®