Planning appeal decision
Four Stones Restaurant, Adams Hill, Clent, Stourbridge, Worcestershire, DY9 9PS
Planning appeal 3219678 at Four Stones Restaurant, Adams Hill, Clent, Stourbridge, Worcestershire, DY9 9PS (Bromsgrove District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 13 September 2021 by Inspector Pleasant L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
without planning permission the erection of a replacement glazed sunroom (“the unauthorised development”)
- Authority
- Bromsgrove District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- other · Change of use
- Inspector
- Pleasant L
- Postcode
- DY9 9PS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Clent Conservation Area
- if the development is inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The disproportionate, inappropriate nature of the Green Belt development, combined with harm to openness and the Clent Conservation Area, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including the fallback position, so very special circumstances were not established.
the substantial harm from Green Belt inappropriateness and openness, together with the great weight given to heritage harm to the conservation area, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations (including a fallback position afforded very limited weight), so the balance tipped against the development
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BDP4.4Policy BDP20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 145Paragraph 144Paragraph 133Paragraph 196
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bromsgrove District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 20266013818Stewards Place, Kidderminster Road, Woodcote Green, Dodford, Bromsgrove, B61 9DZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266010850The Bungalow, Hartle Lane, Bromsgrove, DY9 9UL
- Allowed10 September 20266011301Land at Doctors Hill, Bournheath, Bromsgrove, B61 9JE
- Allowed17 August 20266010859Giles House Farm, Bromsgrove Road, Stoubridge, DY9 9TY
- Dismissed7 August 20266008391Five Spice Restuarant, Stourbridge Road, Belbroughton, DY9 9TX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®