Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted17 August 20213222400

The Land Situate and Known As Land North of Hangman Stone Lane , High Melton , Doncaster , DN5 7SU

Planning appeal 3222400 at The Land Situate and Known As Land North of Hangman Stone Lane , High Melton , Doncaster , DN5 7SU (Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 17 August 2021 by Inspector Freer P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the breach of planning control alleged in the notice is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework).

Erection of a bladder tank (corrected during the appeal to a mesh silo for the storage and dispensing of Digestate bio-fertiliser)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Freer P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the breach of planning control alleged in the notice is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework)
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The mesh silo was found not to be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and not to cause harm to the character and appearance of the area, so it accorded with the development plan and permission was granted.

the proposal accorded with the development plan and no material considerations of sufficient weight indicated otherwise, with the benefits of Digestate use and local support further weighing in favour of granting permission

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS3Policy CS14Policy ENV3Policy ENV6Policy ENV17Policy 33
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 48Paragraph 174
Judgments
Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1QB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No.2) [2000] 2 EWCA Civ 5569; Barvis v SSE [1971] 22 P&CR 710

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

5 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Doncaster

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld30 March 20263349667
    7 Pony Paddocks, Hall Villa Lane, Tollbar, Yorkshire, DN5 0LB
  2. Dismissed10 November 20253362756
    6 Shires Close, Sprotbrough, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN5 7LP
  3. Notice varied and upheld1 July 20253357892
    Former Whitehall Motors, Askern Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN5 0QT
  4. Notice upheld1 July 20253357887
    Former Whitehall Motors, Askern Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN5 0QT
  5. Notice upheld1 July 20253357884
    Former Whitehall Motors, Askern Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN5 0QT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.