Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld18 June 20213238844

Land Adjacent to Frodesley Lane , Frodesley, Shropshire, SY5 7QQ

Planning appeal 3238844 at Land Adjacent to Frodesley Lane , Frodesley, Shropshire, SY5 7QQ (Shropshire County Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 18 June 2021 by Inspector Curnow R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Ground (b) — whether the matters alleged in the Notice have occurred.

without planning permission, the change of use of the Land from a permitted agricultural use to a mixed use of agriculture and the storage of vehicles and vehicle body parts not associated with agriculture

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Curnow R
Postcode
SY5 7QG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Ground (b) — whether the matters alleged in the Notice have occurred
  • Ground (d) — whether, at the time the Notice was issued, no enforcement action could be taken because the use had become immune from enforcement
  • Ground (f) — whether the steps required by the Notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach or injury to amenity
  • Ground (g) — whether the period for compliance is reasonable

What decided it

The Appellant failed to demonstrate, on the balance of probability, that the mixed use of agriculture and vehicle/vehicle-parts storage had continued without a break of more than de minimis significance throughout the ten-year relevant period.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Thurrock BC v SSETR & Holding [2002] EWCA Civ 226; Swale BC v FSS & Lee [2005] EWCA Civ 1568

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

No other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Shropshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed7 July 20263378204
    Orchard Cottage, Ashford Carbonell, Shropshire, SY8 4BX
  2. Notice upheld31 March 20263368306
    Land at Woodview , Newcastle on Clun, Shropshire, SY7 8PE
  3. Allowed30 March 20266003194
    Hengoed Fields, Upper Hengoed, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7EY
  4. Notice upheld10 March 20263356617
    Caradoc Cottage, All Stretton, Church Stretton, SY6 7JN
  5. Planning permission granted30 December 20253333460
    Orchard Cottage, Ashford Carbonel, Ludlow, SY8 4BX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.