Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld16 November 20213242107

Land at Flat 1, 2, 4, And 5 Samara Mansions, 11 Netherhall Gardens, London, NW3 5RN

Planning appeal 3242107 at Land at Flat 1, 2, 4, And 5 Samara Mansions, 11 Netherhall Gardens, London, NW3 5RN (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 16 November 2021 by Inspector Walker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of Samara Mansions and upon the Fitzjohns & Netherhall Conservation Area.

without planning permission: The installation of window and door shutters, shutter boxes and guide rails on the rear and side elevations located on the lower ground, ground and first floor of the building

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Walker A
Postcode
NW3 5RN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of Samara Mansions and upon the Fitzjohns & Netherhall Conservation Area

What decided it

The shutters cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area through obscuration of important architectural detail and incongruous utilitarian appearance, with no public benefits to outweigh this harm.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area, assigned considerable weight and importance, was not outweighed by the private security benefits to the residents.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D2Policy C5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

697 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld17 September 20263376816
    Flat 1, Mexborough, Pratt Street, London, NW1 0BL
  2. Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263372650
    107 West End Lane, London, NW6 4SY
  3. Notice upheld17 September 20263361256
    3 Collard Place, Lonon, NW1 8DU
  4. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263356264
    Flat A, 190 Fordwych Road, London, NW2 3NX
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds15 September 20263378458
    12 Argyle Street, London, WC1H 8EG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.