Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 August 20213247280

424 Lee High Road, LONDON, SE12 8RW

the construction of a part two/part three storey building to the rear of 424 Lee High Road SE12 to provide 100m2 of commercial space (B1 use) on the ground floor and a two bedroom self - contained flat above, construction of additional storey on the existing building facing Lee High Road and conversion of the existing office on the first floor to provide 1 one bedroom and 1 two bedroom self- contained flats, together with 2 car parking spaces with a vehicular turntable with access from Burnt Ash Road

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Woodwards O

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 422 Lee High Road in regard to loss of light
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, particularly with regard to the design of the proposed rear extension, rear dormer, and fenestration to the front elevation
  • the effect of the proposal on the setting of the grade II listed building, the former police station on Lee High Road

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the proposal would not unacceptably harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through loss of light, combined with the poor design of the rear dormer window which would harm the character and appearance of the area.

Framework references: 199, 203

Plan policies cited: Policy CS15, Policy CS16, Policy DM32, Policy DM30, Policy DM31, Policy DM36, Policy HC1, Policy D3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.