Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed18 October 20213252232

Wintersett Farm Court, Ferry Top Lane, Wintersett, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 2EB

Planning appeal 3252232 at Wintersett Farm Court, Ferry Top Lane, Wintersett, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 2EB (Wakefield Metropolitan District Council) was allowed on 18 October 2021 by Inspector Dowsett J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Proposed residential development: three link-semi-detached dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dowsett J
Postcode
WF4 2EB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal constitutes limited infilling within a village as defined by the NPPF paragraph 149(e), and therefore is not inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Strategy Policy CS1Core Strategy Policy CS3DPD Policy D1Core Strategy Policy CS10DPD Policy D9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 144Paragraph 150
Judgments
Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263361281
    Wragby Grange, Doncaster Road, Wragby, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 1QX
  2. Dismissed10 August 20266004277
    Land At Back Lane, Woolley, Wakefield, WF4 2JT
  3. Allowed10 July 20266006858
    Land at, Pontefract Road, Pontefract, WF11 8RJ
  4. Allowed2 July 20263368025
    Land South of Wakefield B Substation, And East of Neil Fox Way, Wakefield, WF1 5DB
  5. Dismissed30 June 20266005423
    Land off Lee Moor Lane, Stanley, Wakefield, WF3 4EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.