Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20213254443

88 Riddlesdown Road, Purley, CR8 1DD

the demolition of existing five-bedroom detached house and erection of a block of flats comprising of 21no. units

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wraight G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing
  • Whether or not the proposal makes adequate provision for larger homes
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal's conflict with development plan policies on affordable housing provision, which could not be resolved because the submitted planning obligation was defective and given no weight.

The moderate weight benefits of housing and employment delivery, and the moderate weight attached to the larger homes shortfall, did not outweigh the conflict with the development plan's affordable housing policies, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

Plan policies cited: GG4, H4, H5, SP2.4, SP2.5, SP2.7, DM1, DM10.1, D4, SP4.1, SP4.2, DM10

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.