Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 September 20213254613

Blue Bird Tea Rooms, 79 Granville Road, St Margarets Bay, Kent, CT15 6DT

change of use from tearooms and holiday let, to provide holiday let unit and managers accommodation above

Authority
Dover District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Spencer D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the loss of the tearoom facility would have an unacceptably adverse impact on the local tourism economy, for users of nearby walking and cycling routes and for the local community
  • Whether a permanent residential use (proposed managers accommodation) would be justified and sustainably located
  • The effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the landscape and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and the special character of the South Foreland Heritage Coast

What decided it

The significant, unmitigated harm to the landscape character and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs AONB and South Foreland Heritage Coast arising from the domestication of the curtilage for permanent residential use.

The sustainability of the residential use and absence of tourism harm did not outweigh the significant landscape and AONB/Heritage Coast harm, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

Framework references: 84, 93, 100, 80, 56, 130, 174, 176, 178, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy DM4, Policy DM15, Policy DM16, Policy CO5

Judgments cited: Braintree District Council v. SSCLG, Greyread Ltd and Granville Developments [2018] EWCA 610Civ

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.