Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 July 20223254911

Willow Tree Riding Establishment, Ronver Road, Lewisham, SE12 0NL

Planning appeal 3254911 at Willow Tree Riding Establishment, Ronver Road, Lewisham, SE12 0NL (London Borough of Lewisham) was dismissed on 4 July 2022 by Inspector Szymanski D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land (MOL).

Demolition of existing stables and construction of new equestrian facilities to include stalls, a barn shelter, tack building, reception/office, and a perimeter track for riding, together with use of existing access onto Ronver Road and associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
leisure-sport · Major retail and services
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
SE12 0NL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land (MOL)
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area, including upon protected trees
  • the effect of the proposed development upon biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of No 77 Ronver Road, with particular reference to outlook
  • the effect of the proposed development upon highway safety
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The other considerations advanced did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the openness of Metropolitan Open Land and the moderate harm to character and appearance, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify inappropriate development did not exist.

The substantial weight attached to harm to MOL and moderate weight attached to harm to character and appearance were not clearly outweighed by the limited/moderate weight benefits (fallback position, economic benefits, drainage and biodiversity improvements), so the appeal was dismissed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP12Policy G3Policy GI1Policy CSP15Policy 30Policy 25Policy G6Policy T6Policy CSP14Policy DM29Policy DM30Policy DM15Policy SI12Policy SI13Policy GI2Policy GI1a
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 138Paragraph 174Paragraph 179Paragraph 180Paragraph 130Paragraph 111Paragraph 137Paragraph 148

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

376 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed23 October 20266013784
    58a Manor Park, Hither Green, London, SE13 5RL
  2. Allowed11 September 20266004929
    1 - 3A Doggett Road, London, SE6 4PZ
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266010822
    Land Adjacent to 115 Loampit Vale, London, SE13 7TG
  4. Dismissed8 July 20266005937
    1 A Harcourt Road, London, SE4 2AJ
  5. Allowed20 March 20263375896
    62 to 72, Ladywell Road, London, SE13 7HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.