Planning appeal decision
Goko Supermarket, 7 Urban Hive Theydon Road, London, E5 9BQ
Planning appeal 3255220 at Goko Supermarket, 7 Urban Hive Theydon Road, London, E5 9BQ (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 15 November 2021 by Inspector Satheesan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the change of use on the provision of industrial land/floorspace in a Priority Industrial Area (PIA).
without planning permission the material change of use of the property to use as a supermarket (A1 retail) and the associated installation of two air conditioning units on the rear elevation of the property
- Authority
- London Borough of Hackney
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- retail · Change of use
- Inspector
- Satheesan R
- Postcode
- E5 9BQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the change of use on the provision of industrial land/floorspace in a Priority Industrial Area (PIA)
- The effect of the change of use on the vitality and viability of the existing retail centres
- The effect of the AC units on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of Redwood Court, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
What decided it
The development conflicts with the development plan in three material respects—loss of industrial land in a PIA without marketing evidence, retail use outside town centres without required assessments, and unacceptable noise impact on neighbouring residents—and no material considerations outweigh these harms.
The needs of the local Jewish community and the requirement for local shopping facilities were given moderate to limited weight respectively, but did not outweigh the harms identified in relation to loss of industrial land, retail centre vitality, and neighbouring living conditions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP28Policy LP32Policy LP2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hackney
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice varied and upheld18 September 202633607242B Woodberry Down, Hackney, London, N4 2TG
- Allowed17 August 20266010972101 Dalston Lane, London, E8 1NH
- Allowed14 July 20266004379152 Bethune Road, London, N16 5DS
- Dismissed14 May 20266003534212 Millfields Road, London, E5 0AR
- Dismissed12 May 20263371819Railway Arches 348-349 Bocking Street, Hackney, London, E8 3RU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®